Is PicMonkey a Tool or a Toy?
A friend of mine aspires to launch a photography business. She has been learning composition and lighting from an established photographer. She has already done some portraits, and she had been booked for a wedding. We were “talking shop” about cameras, lenses, and editing. She mentioned she uses PicMonkey for editing. I wasn’t familiar with PicMonkey initially, but my first instinct was that a pro-oriented tool like Photoshop would be a better choice for a professional result. That is just my default recommendation based on the axiom that you usually get what you pay for. However, I knew I was ignorant of PicMonkey.
I’m not a fan of ignorance, and I don’t want to rest on my own assumptions, especially if my assumptions would lead me to pay for Photoshop if it were not uniquely necessary and powerful. I started Googling to find out more. The initial results I found were quite warm toward PicMonkey, but they seemed a little suspicious to me. I came across articles with titles like these:
PicMonkey: Photoshop for Broke People
Making Professional Looking Pictures Using PicMonkey
Don’t Want to Learn Photoshop? Use PicMonkey Instead!
Those aren’t the actual article titles I found, but you get the idea. The sentiment from those articles was that photographers and designers who want to save a buck can use PicMonkey and avoid purchasing Photoshop. I didn’t dig too far, but I didn’t find anything overly critical of PicMonkey. My “too good to be true” alarm started going off. I wanted to explore both sides of the issue, so I posted questions on social media to get some feedback from friends. Much to my surprise, the official Twitter account for PicMonkey (@PicMonkeyApp) actually replied. Here is the conversation, unedited, for your edification:
Is @PicMonkeyApp a @Photoshop killer or a toy? I’m thinking there’s no comparison for pros, but I’m open-minded to unbiased feedback. — Andy Johnston (@AJDesignCo) May 19, 2014
Here is PicMonkey’s response:
@AJDesignCo whatcha doing on @photoshop that you can’t w PicMonkey?? — PicMonkey (@PicMonkeyApp) May 20, 2014
Well, that wasn’t too much help since I hadn’t yet used PicMonkey. Since I had the ear of PicMonkey on Twitter, I started checking out PicMonkey and found a few other questions worth asking:
Thx for the reply! Haven’t used @PicMonkeyApp, but I wonder, can it handle smart objects? What about a vector EPS? Not hating, just curious. — Andy Johnston (@AJDesignCo) May 20, 2014
@PicMonkeyApp Uh oh…just tried and was unable to import/upload/edit a Canon RAW (.CR2). What did I miss? Or can it only handle JPG? — Andy Johnston (@AJDesignCo) May 20, 2014
@PicMonkeyApp The blog is no help. pic.twitter.com/fofz2Z4Yk0 — Andy Johnston (@AJDesignCo) May 20, 2014
In @Photoshop, I can create a new image from the clipboard. Is there a way to do that in @PicMonkeyApp? — Andy Johnston (@AJDesignCo) May 20, 2014
Still not hatin’ on @PicMonkeyApp, but images are resized to a max of 2800px on the longest size. That’s 9 inches. pic.twitter.com/5t5wDoGBbe — Andy Johnston (@AJDesignCo) May 20, 2014
I haven’t received answers yet from PicMonkey, and it has only been about an hour. But based on my initial findings, here is my conclusion:
IMHO, @PicMonkeyApp looks GREAT for light tasks. Blogs, social media, household projects. But serious photogs need @Photoshop or @Lightroom. — Andy Johnston (@AJDesignCo) May 20, 2014
Let me make something clear by rehashing a point from an earlier tweet: I am not trashing PicMonkey. For certain things, it is fantastic! If you need a lightweight, cloud-accessible solution for editing images for a blog or social media, PicMonkey is wonderful. For crying out loud, you can’t even install Photoshop on a Chromebook! If you are preparing images for standard definition or even full HD (1920×1080) displays, PicMonkey will work well. If you just want to make fun edits to images to print out at home and slap on your refrigerator, go ahead and use PicMonkey.
Wow! LOVE THIS…Well done, as I had certain questions and concerns in regards to what PicMonkey was capable of. They are great for the “Just Having Fun” aspect (ahem, as a Toy), but to repeat your closing statement…professional tools are needed. Great Entry!
Thanks for your comment Dave! Maybe one day PicMonkey will be strong enough to render Photoshop unnecessary. But that time is not here yet.
I designed a simple poster that was 4 feet by 2 feet and it came out crystal clear using picmonkey. Just FYI. 🙂
That’s great to know, Jimi! In a pinch, PicMonkey and other “non-pro” tools can do a good job. This may be especially true of certain types of designs…simple color, not a lot of high-contrast diagonal lines, etc. Plus, PicMonkey’s specs may have improved (I haven’t checked recently). Large format printing is a place where pixels-per-inch (PPI) requirements can be relaxed a bit.
If PicMonkey is still only 2,800 pixels on the long side, that’s a max PPI of 58.333 PPI. Across the room, a 4′ x 2′ poster at 58 PPI may not look bad. But a poster at 150 PPI will look noticeably better than one at 58 PPI to most people, even non-designers. Resolution is unforgiving. It’s simple math. 300 PPI is the standard for print quality on small format pieces. 150 PPI is a good goal to shoot for with larger format pieces. For extremely large designs like billboards, you can even get away with 20 or 30 PPI. Most portrait photographers and designers will NOT be satisfied with 58 PPI for their large prints.
Well that sure answered all my questions. Thanks
Glad to help, Sandy. Take care!
I have used Picmonkey for 5 years now. You can change the image size for printing to something far more acceptable than just 9″ simply by changing the ppi when you are saving the image to your computer after editing it. I usually save my images at 3300×4200 – 13.8MP (or larger) which is acceptable for an 11X14″ print. It’s really easy to do!
That’s great to know, Lindsey! Resolution is mysterious to many folks, but it shouldn’t be. It’s just simple math. Your tip about setting the image size is good to know. PicMonkey can meet some people’s needs. However, one of my main points is that for professional photographers who need to do high quality work at large formats really shouldn’t use PicMonkey. In fact, I just tested the system. I created a 2″ x 3″ artboard in Illustrator with edge to edge text at a size of 1 point. I exported that image to the largest JPG Illustrator would allow me to generate (5461 x 8192). I then uploaded that to PicMonkey. I exported it at the largest size the system would allow, which was 5461 x 8191 (coincidentally one pixel in height smaller…). I saved that exported image to my computer and reviewed it. The file I uploaded was 5461 x 8192, but the resulting export was 3344 x 5016 (even though the export dialog told me it would be 5461 x 8191). 3334 x 5016 is still nasty large. It’s 11″ x 16″ at 300ppi. PicMonkey *can* handle some large things. But the upper limit of the tool falls short for many other purposes.
Most of my photography is done for the web. So I mainly use / edit JPEG. There are some times when I want to use the RAW file, for that I use Photoshop / Lightroom. But honestly, I would say that most of my touch ups are done in PicMonkey as it produces great results in the quarter of the time it takes to go through the Photoshop dance.
Awesome! Yep, for smaller web and social images, PicMonkey is great.